P-G2Q FUEL DISPENSER

P-G2Q FUEL DISPENSER

FlowMeter Type : Optional

Accuracy : ±0.2%

Pressure Loss (kg/cm) :Under 0.25

Motor Voltage(V) :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp): 1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle :Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition :-40~~+55degree

Control Type :Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset Function :Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter) :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer: 1~~9,999,999

Hose :4.5m

Weight :215kg

Dimension(L×W×H) : 1060*550*1620(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container : 40ft: 44 20ft: 22

C/DC convert type switch power is universally adopted in fuel dispenser. Diagram 3-13: Structural sketch map of liner voltage stabilizing power Diagram 3-14: Structural sketch map of switch stable voltage power adopted DC/DC converter Diagram 3-15: Structural sketc fuel dispenser h map of switch voltage stabilizing power adopted pulse transformer As an electronic component in fuel dispenser, stable voltage power is easily failed and possibly leads to whole trouble of fuel dispenser once appear doesn’t work. Generally, liner voltage stabilizing power adopts 78 series special voltage stabilizing integrated circuit, such as 7805 and 7812, simple design and convenient maintenance. In Diagram 3-16, a popular liner voltage stabilizing power circuit of fuel dispenser is illustrated. Switch power supply adopted pulse transformer will not introduced here, reference with relevant boos when necessary. Diagram 3-16: Circuit diagram of liner voltage stabilizing fuel dispenser power These integrated circuits of LM2576, LM4962 AND MC34063A are widely adopted in DC/DC transformer power supply. Intrins fuel dispenser ic safety voltage stabilizing power supply in fuel dispenser This kind of direct current is able to employ in flammable and combustible environment only when mounted safety barrier. It also called intrinsic safety voltage stabilizing power supply illustrated in Diagram 3-18. Explosion-proof power supply is only used in explosion-proof box or an atmosphere without explosive gas, including its associated circuit. It is allowed to employ intrinsic safety power in explosive atmosphere, but must in explosion-proof box or an environment without explosive gas. However, its associated circuit is permitted to use in explosive gas atmosphere if meet requirements concerned. The major difference between intrinsic safety power and explosion-proof power is whether install safety barrier. Diagram 3-17: Voltage stabilizing power circuit of DC/DC convertor Diagram 3-18: Sketch map of intrinsic safety power The function of setting a safety barrier i

le point dacceptation　　 3 Code confidentiel erron pour la premi ╮e fois et transaction non aboutie　　 4 Code confidentiel erron pour la deuxi ╩e fois et transaction non aboutie　　 5 Code confidentiel erron pour la troisi ╩e f fuel dispenser ois et transaction non aboutie　　 6 Carte non authentifi e　　 7 Non r ponse calcul CAI metteur　　 Cartes bancaires (Table MEDIAA 10)　　 8 Non r ponse calcul CAI acqu reur　　 9 CAI metteur erron　　 10 Carte grill e au cours de la transaction　　 11 Carte interdite en liste de contr 磍e de num ros de porteur　　 12 Carte refus e en liste de contr 磍e de num ros de porteur　　 13 Carte interdite en liste de BINs　　 14 Carte refus e en liste de BINs� fuel dispenser �　 15 Carte interdite en r ponse ?demande dautorisation　　 16 Carte refus e en r ponse ?demand fuel dispenser e dautorisation　　 17 Incident de structure lors contr 磍e de flux　　 18 Incident technique sur contr 磍e de flux　　 19 Incident technique lors calcul certificat　　 20 Incident technique lors acquisition des donn es porteur　　 21 Incident technique lors de l dition ticket porteur　　 22 Incident (sans for ge possible) lors dune demande dautorisation　　 23 Format des donn es porteur B0 erron　　 24 Date de fin de validit de clef publique atteinte lors authentification statique　　 25 Incoh rence donn es lors contr 磍e authentification statique　　 26 Monnaie ou devise dune application carte non g r e　　 99 Autre incident CB : information compl mentaire contenue dans D5039　　 101 Liste noire　　

s armed forces have medium-sized cargo aircraft for “tactical airlift�?but are desperately short of the large aircraft needed for “strategic airlift�?over long distances. Increasingly, governments are pooling their money, either to rent large aircraft from Russian and Ukr fuel dispenser ainian firms, to buy American planes or to make their own. Trying to redress the disparity between America and the rest, NATO has drawn up lists of “capabilities�?that countries must acquire. A more important development, strongly supported by America, is the formation of a 20,000-strong deployable standing army, known as the NATO Response Force (NRF), with land, air and sea components. This is supposed to begin deploying in troublespots around the world at five days notice, making a “forced entry�?if necessary and sustaining itself for up to two months before handing over to follow-on troops. Elements of the NRF have been used for humanitarian relief, but the force fuel dispenser still has too many gaps for it to be declared fully operational at the Riga summit. General James Jones, an American and fuel dispenser NATO s most senior commander, says the tradition that each national contingent should pay its own way (a policy known as “costs lie where they fall�? has been a huge disincentive for many countries. He wants more of the expenses to be paid jointly by all the allies. If not, he says, many countries will hold back for fear that they will bear the cost of an expensive operation if the NRF happens to be activated on their watch. Rather than spend money on making their armies more able to operate overseas, some Europeans have turned instead to the internal business of creating a defence arm for the EU, known as the European Security and Defence Policy. Even as NATO builds up the NRF, the EU is also building its own rapid response forces. The EU s original aim of creating a 60,000-strong force, able to deploy at 60 days notice for tasks ranging from disaster relief to crisis management, has been all but abando