K-GA FUEL DISPENSER

K-GA FUEL DISPENSER

Pump Type :Optional

Inlet Pressure :>=54kPa.

Flow rate (L/min.): 55±5

Suction Distance (m) :6(verticalmente) / 50(orizzontalmente)

FlowMeter Type : Optional

Accuracy : ±0.2%

Motor Voltage(V): 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp) :1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle :Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition :-40~~+55degree

Control Type :Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset : Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter) :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price: 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer :1~~9,999,999

Hose :4.5m

Weight :280kg

Dimension(L×W×H) : 1180*650*2020(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container : 40ft: 29

erance not exceed ±0.3%，repeated measuring no more than 0.15% as fuel dispenser is operated within the flow range between m fuel dispenser aximum flow-rate (Qmax) and minimum flow-rate (Qmin). Flux scope is also called measurable range --- between minimum measured value and maximum flow-rate within basic tolerance. The ratio of maximum flow rate to minimum flow rate is called measurable ratio. In model testing the value is 10 to 1. Accuracy testing is conducted at six flow points within the measurable range so as to get their tolerances. This relation between tolerance and flux is called the tolerance nature of flow meter. The less flow tolerance the better. Measurable range ratio is 10 to 1 as fuel dispenser being left factory, testing three flux points, that is, Qmax, 0.4 Qmax, 0 fuel dispenser .1 Qmax . However, the ratio in operation place is 5 to 1, only testing two flow points -- Qmax , 0.2 Qmax . Minimum measured volume testing Testing purpose is to assess indicative tolerance when refueling by minimum measured value. Relevant regulations stipulate that the minimum flow rate don’t surplus 5L as for a fuel dispenser with maximum flow rate no more than 60L. Its maximum tolerance in terms of minimum measured value don’t exceed ±0.5%, measurable repeatability no more than ±0.25%. Flow stoppage testing The testing is conducted in order to define the possible tolerance range that generated in refueling progress in which hydraulic flow stop suddenly due to some accidents like power cut. Vapor separator performance testing It is conducted to value the capacity of vapor separator how much vapor would be divided from oil. Vapor separator’s function is to ensure that media passing over flow meter should be in single direction with fuel dispenser out any foam or bubble. Otherwise, flow meter can’t get right value of measurement. Volume fluctuation testing The test is aimed at defining the hose’s inner cubage variability of fuel dispenser under maximum pressure condition. According to fuel dispenser’s working principal, hose always

€ ns is the logical nozzle status　　 acd is the Assign Control device　　 fuel dispenser The Data_Lg of the FP_Status_Message is always 0.　　 PCD Comment:　　 Obviously this unsolicited Data_Id must be generated by　　 the PCD when ever a change occurs in the state logical　　 nozzle or assignment.　　FP31_2.22 IFSF - STANDARD FORECOURT PROTOCOL October 2005　　 DISPENSER APPLICATION　　Page: 110　　 FUELLING POINT DATABASE　　 DB_Ad = FP_ID (21H-24H)　　 Data fuel dispenser Field Type ReadWrite MO　　 Data Element Name　　 Description　　 _Id (Value) in State　　 101 Bin8 O　　 FP_Multi_Nozzle_Status_Message　　 (65H)　　 A FP_Multi_Nozzle_Status_Message must be sent　　 unsolicited (without acknowledge) by the FP when ever a　　 change has occurred in the status of the　　 Multi_Nozzle_State (Data_Id 44).　　 The FP_Multi_Nozzle_Status_Message includes　　 - Multi_Nozzle_State (Data_Id = 44)　　 Please note that the FP_Multi_Nozzle_Status_Message　　 Data_Id is built up as follows:　　 101 0 44 01 mns　　 Where: mns is the multi nozzle status　　 fuel dispenser The Data_Lg of the FP_Multi_Nozzle_Status_Message is　　 always 0.　　 102 Bin8+ O　　 FP_Running_Transaction_Me

ven country, or a given continent, or indeed the world? The problem is that banks do go wrong from time to time, and whe fuel dispenser never that happens, size turns out to be their worst feature. The bigger a troubled bank, the less credible a government s claim that it will not intervene, the harder to manage the failure, and the bigger the final bill to taxpayers. Even without a crisis, a bank is getting too big for comfort if regulators start making their rules around it. That stifles new competition and provides room for risk to grow. So even if economies of scale were infinite, bigger banks would not always be better banks. One answer might be for countries to cap the size of any bank as a share of GDP. The figure would differ from country to country, depending on fuel dispenser the appetite for public spending, the place of financial services in the economy and the desire to accommodate national champions. The cap for America might be 1% of GDP for any one bank s capital, beyond which it might grow organically but not by acquisition. That would be no more intrusive than the current American rule stopping any one bank gaining more than a 10% market share of deposits by acquisition, a limit already touched by Bank of America. But that last factor aside, there is no obvious limit to consolidation currently in sight, only supply and demand. In February Charles Prince, Citigroup s chairman, offered his view of the future “Nobody wants to sell. Everybody wants to buy something. Any bank holding company of size is in the acquisition mode, not the selling mode. It s just as simple as that.�  © 2006 .  About sponsorship Sources and acknowledgements May 18th 2006 Fro fuel dispenser m Economist.com ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank, in addition to those quoted directly in this survey Jonathan Anderson, Douglas Beal, Frank Czichowski, Joe Evangelisti, Stuart Graham, Peter Havlik, Lars Hofer, Andrey Ilyin, Norimichi Kanari, Eric Kraus, Monish Kumar, Holger Michae